<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Measure E for &#8220;Excellence in Education in San Marino&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.sanmarinocarealestatehomes.com/measure-e-for-excellence-in-education-in-san-marino/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.sanmarinocarealestatehomes.com/measure-e-for-excellence-in-education-in-san-marino/</link>
	<description>Search All San Marino CA Realtors Houses and Property for Sale in MLS</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 23:38:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: irina</title>
		<link>http://www.sanmarinocarealestatehomes.com/measure-e-for-excellence-in-education-in-san-marino/comment-page-1/#comment-273</link>
		<dc:creator>irina</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Apr 2009 05:40:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sanmarinocarealestatehomes.com/?p=419#comment-273</guid>
		<description>Hi Stacey,

Is your parent living in the San Marino home?  

There is a senior exemption for homeowners who are 65 or older. Any individual 65 or older who owns and occupies a single family home in the San Marino district is eligible for a full exemption from the cost of Measure E.

I believe that if your parent is occupying the home, you will be able to take advantage of the exemption.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Stacey,</p>
<p>Is your parent living in the <a href="http://pasadenaviews.com/san-marino-city-guide/" >San Marino</a> home?  </p>
<p>There is a senior exemption for homeowners who are 65 or older. Any individual 65 or older who owns and occupies a single family home in the San Marino district is eligible for a full exemption from the cost of Measure E.</p>
<p>I believe that if your parent is occupying the home, you will be able to take advantage of the exemption.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: stacey dennis</title>
		<link>http://www.sanmarinocarealestatehomes.com/measure-e-for-excellence-in-education-in-san-marino/comment-page-1/#comment-272</link>
		<dc:creator>stacey dennis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 17:23:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sanmarinocarealestatehomes.com/?p=419#comment-272</guid>
		<description>My parent (senior) and I jointly own a residence in San Marino.  How does Measure E apply to my situation? Exempted?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My parent (senior) and I jointly own a residence in <a href="http://pasadenaviews.com/san-marino-city-guide/" >San Marino</a>.  How does Measure E apply to my situation? Exempted?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Ko</title>
		<link>http://www.sanmarinocarealestatehomes.com/measure-e-for-excellence-in-education-in-san-marino/comment-page-1/#comment-271</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Ko</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2009 22:52:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sanmarinocarealestatehomes.com/?p=419#comment-271</guid>
		<description>Here is another district with a parcel tax that has to be extended because no root cause solution was committed to.  A parcel tax is a band-aid if the school district does not commit to balancing its expenses with expected revenues.

&quot;In 2004, voters approved Measure E: a $98 parcel tax that generates approximately $2 million per year for the Las Virgenes Unified School District. It required a 2/3 voter approval to pass. That approval expires next year.

On Tuesday, November 6th, voters will vote on an extension of Measure E. This time, for 8 years. Like last time, It will pass if there is 2/3 voter approval. &quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here is another district with a parcel tax that has to be extended because no root cause solution was committed to.  A parcel tax is a band-aid if the school district does not commit to balancing its expenses with expected revenues.</p>
<p>&#8220;In 2004, voters approved Measure E: a $98 parcel tax that generates approximately $2 million per year for the Las Virgenes Unified School District. It required a 2/3 voter approval to pass. That approval expires next year.</p>
<p>On Tuesday, November 6th, voters will vote on an extension of Measure E. This time, for 8 years. Like last time, It will pass if there is 2/3 voter approval. &#8220;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Ko</title>
		<link>http://www.sanmarinocarealestatehomes.com/measure-e-for-excellence-in-education-in-san-marino/comment-page-1/#comment-270</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Ko</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2009 22:49:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sanmarinocarealestatehomes.com/?p=419#comment-270</guid>
		<description>What kind of accountability.

This is another taxpayer bailout without conditions.  The SMUSD needs to commit to balancing the budget by year-5 of the 6 year parcel tax.  Otherwise, in year 6 we will get another sad story to why we need to extend the parcel tax.

Buying votes with a senior exemption is not ethical.  

GM&#039;s management, employees and unions have to commit to concessions in order to get another taxpayer bailout.  What are the employees, administrators and unions concessions for the parcel tax?  Is each employee reducing their salaries and benefits to meet the remaining budget shortfall?  Of course not.  Those remaning keep their full salaries and benefits.

As Steve Lopez wrote in the LA Times last week, length of service and not quality is the deciding factor in the layoffs of LA teachers.  The same is true for SMUSD.  

Is the parcel tax required so that the good performing teachers laid off can be brought back; otherwise the quality of education will fall?

No on Measure E.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What kind of accountability.</p>
<p>This is another taxpayer bailout without conditions.  The SMUSD needs to commit to balancing the budget by year-5 of the 6 year parcel tax.  Otherwise, in year 6 we will get another sad story to why we need to extend the parcel tax.</p>
<p>Buying votes with a senior exemption is not ethical.  </p>
<p>GM&#8217;s management, employees and unions have to commit to concessions in order to get another taxpayer bailout.  What are the employees, administrators and unions concessions for the parcel tax?  Is each employee reducing their salaries and benefits to meet the remaining budget shortfall?  Of course not.  Those remaning keep their full salaries and benefits.</p>
<p>As Steve Lopez wrote in the LA Times last week, length of service and not quality is the deciding factor in the layoffs of LA teachers.  The same is true for SMUSD.  </p>
<p>Is the parcel tax required so that the good performing teachers laid off can be brought back; otherwise the quality of education will fall?</p>
<p>No on Measure E.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

